Canadian Parliament Pays Tribute to Slain Khalistani Hardeep Singh Nijjar; In return India’s Strong Message to Canada on Terrorism

Spread the love
  • The Canadian Parliament observed a moment of silence on Tuesday to honor Hardeep Singh Nijjar whose killing outside a Gurudwara last June sparked diplomatic tensions with India.
  • The fallout from Nijjar’s killing was exacerbated by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s controversial allegations against the Indian government.
  • India has denied receiving specific information from Canadian authorities about the case but has voiced ongoing concerns about pro-Khalistani elements operating freely in Canada.
  • In response, the Indian Consulate General in Vancouver announced a service commemorating the anniversary of the Air India Flight 182 bombing.
  • The 1985 act of terrorism resulted in 329 deaths, including 268 Canadians, marking it as one of history’s deadliest aviation-related terrorist incidents.
  • Despite Ottawa’s denials of harboring criminals and terrorists, India remains concerned about rising extremism and criminal activities linked to Punjab-based gangs operating freely in Canada.
  • The tribute to Hardeep Singh Nijjar in the Canadian Parliament underscores global security’s interconnectedness and the need to address threats posed by extremist ideologies with vigilance.

The Canadian Parliament convened on Tuesday to observe a moment of silence in honor of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Canadian citizen of Indian descent whose tragic killing outside a Gurudwara on June 18 last year sparked significant diplomatic friction between Canada and India. This solemn gesture comes amidst ongoing investigations by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) into the circumstances surrounding Nijjar’s death, which remain sensitive due to the geopolitical implications they carry.

The fallout from Nijjar’s killing was exacerbated by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s controversial allegations against the Indian government. Trudeau’s assertions, implicating India in Nijjar’s death, were swiftly refuted by New Delhi as baseless and unfounded. The ensuing diplomatic standoff saw relations between the two nations deteriorate to a historic low, prompting responses and countermeasures from both sides.

India, while formally denying receipt of specific information from Canadian authorities regarding the case, has repeatedly expressed concerns over the presence of pro-Khalistani elements operating freely within Canada. The security of Indian diplomats stationed in Canada has been a particular point of contention, with reports of threats from extremist groups necessitating heightened security measures and diplomatic recalibration.

In response to Canada’s handling of the situation, the Indian Consulate General in Vancouver announced a commemorative service to mark the anniversary of the Air India Flight 182 bombing. This act of terrorism in 1985 resulted in the deaths of 329 individuals, including 268 Canadians, making it one of the deadliest aviation-related terrorist acts in history. The consulate’s statement underscored India’s commitment to combating terrorism globally and reiterated the need for international cooperation in addressing extremist activities originating from abroad.

Despite assertions to the contrary, with Ottawa denying accusations of harbouring criminals and terrorists, India continues to raise concerns over rising extremism and criminal activities linked to Punjab-based gangs operating with impunity from Canadian soil. This ongoing friction underscores the complex dynamics of international relations and the challenges inherent in balancing security interests with diplomatic dialogue.

The commemoration of Hardeep Singh Nijjar in the Canadian Parliament serves as a poignant reminder of the interconnectedness of global security and the need for vigilance in addressing threats posed by extremist ideologies. As investigations into Nijjar’s death progress and diplomatic engagements evolve, both Canada and India face the task of navigating these sensitive issues while seeking to preserve diplomatic ties and uphold national security imperatives.

Moving forward, the resolution of these tensions will likely depend on continued cooperation, transparency, and mutual respect between the two nations, as they work towards addressing shared challenges and ensuring the safety and security of their respective citizens and diplomatic personnel.

(With inputs from agencies)

Related posts

Leave a Comment

3 + 5 =