The Corruption Allegations Against AAP Leaders The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has approved the prosecution of former Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) ministers Manish Sisodia and Satyendar Jain under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The charges stem from an alleged scam involving the construction of classrooms in Delhi government schools. This decision paves the way for an official First Information Report (FIR) against the two senior AAP leaders, intensifying the ongoing political battle between AAP and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The Alleged Scam: Overpriced Classroom Construction The controversy revolves around the construction of 12,748 rooms in government schools, with a total expenditure of Rs 2,892.65 crore. Allegations suggest that the cost of construction was highly inflated, leading to financial misconduct at a massive scale. A BJP delegation, including Harish Khurana, Kapil Mishra, and Neelkanth Bakshi, had in July 2019 accused the AAP government of misappropriating over Rs 2,000 crore in the project. According to sources, the complaint states that the school rooms and buildings were constructed at an exorbitant rate of Rs 8,800 per square foot. The lump sum cost per room, as per the awarded tender, was Rs 24.86 lakh. It has been alleged that the actual construction cost was inflated nearly five times, defrauding taxpayers and siphoning off public funds under the guise of educational infrastructure development. Audit Findings and Financial Irregularities An audit conducted by the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) exposed multiple discrepancies in the project execution. The CVC report revealed that 63 tenders were awarded at Rs 860.82 crore, with cost deviations ranging between 17% and 90%. This resulted in an estimated escalation of Rs 326.25 crore. Other irregularities highlighted in the audit include:

• Work amounting to Rs 42.5 crore executed without proper tender through pre-existing contracts for other school projects.
• Construction of 1,214 toilet blocks with an extra expenditure of Rs 37 crore.
• Overall mismanagement and potential misuse of public funds, warranting a thorough investigation into the role of the ministers overseeing the project.

The Role of Sisodia and Jain in the Alleged Fraud At the time of the alleged scam, Manish Sisodia held the Finance and Education portfolios, while Satyendar Jain was in charge of the Public Works Department (PWD), which managed the construction work. The prosecution sanction cites that such large-scale financial discrepancies could not have occurred without the direct involvement or oversight failure of these ministers. A source stated, “The role of the Education and Finance Minister, Manish Sisodia, and PWD Minister, Satyendar Jain, must be thoroughly investigated. A scam of this magnitude would not have been possible without their complicity or negligence, as the cost was inflated nearly five times the standard rate.” AAP’s Response: Defiance Against BJP Reacting to the prosecution sanction, Manish Sisodia dismissed the allegations, claiming that the BJP-led central government was using investigative agencies to target AAP leaders. In a statement, he said, “It has come to my attention that the Union government has lodged an FIR against me and Satyendar Jain regarding the construction of school buildings and classrooms. I want to tell the BJP and the Union government—file as many cases as you want. Whether it is against me, Satyendar Jain, Atishi, Arvind Kejriwal, or any other AAP leader, we will not bow down before the BJP.” AAP leaders have repeatedly accused the BJP of political vendetta, arguing that their focus on improving public education in Delhi is being unfairly maligned. Possible Outcomes and Political Implications The approval of prosecution marks a critical point in the ongoing legal and political battle between AAP and the BJP. If the FIR leads to a conviction, it could severely impact AAP’s credibility and electoral prospects. Conversely, if the case fails to prove substantial wrongdoing, AAP may leverage the issue to bolster its image as a party fighting against political persecution. As the legal proceedings unfold, the case will likely remain a focal point of Delhi’s political landscape, with both parties seeking to gain leverage from the developments. The final verdict will not only determine the fate of Sisodia and Jain but may also shape the future of AAP’s governance and electoral standing.   (With inputs from agencies)