MEA’s Strong Reaction: The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) of India responded firmly to a report published by The Washington Post, dismissing it as containing “unwarranted and unsubstantiated imputations on a serious matter.” The report alleged the involvement of a Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) officer in a foiled assassination attempt on India-designated Khalistani terrorist Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, based in New York.
Ongoing Investigation: MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal highlighted an ongoing investigation by a High-Level Committee formed by the Government of India to address security concerns shared by the US government regarding organized criminal networks and terrorists. Jaiswal emphasized the importance of refraining from speculative and irresponsible comments on the matter.
Claims in The Washington Post Report: The report asserted that a RAW officer provided final instructions to a “hired hit team” tasked with assassinating Pannun, who had threatened attacks against India. It alleged that the assassination plan was likely known to Indian National Security Adviser Ajit Doval but lacked official evidence. The report further claimed that the RAW chief approved the operation under pressure to eliminate Sikh extremists abroad, collaborating with an Indian national, Nikhil Gupta, who communicated with the hit team via encrypted texts.
Impact on Diplomatic Relations: The foiled murder plot emerged following the killing of Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Canada, straining relations between India and Canada. The report suggested that the US refrained from punitive measures against India to avoid diplomatic rifts, opting against expelling RAW officers or imposing economic sanctions.
US Position on Cross-border Actions: US Ambassador to India, Eric Garcetti, emphasized the importance of respecting sovereignty and human rights, stating that no government employee should be involved in plotting the assassination of a foreign citizen. He stressed the need for countries to avoid crossing “red lines” in their actions.
India’s Response and Inquiry Commission: External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar affirmed India’s commitment to investigating the matter based on information provided. He highlighted India’s national security interests in the case and noted the establishment of an inquiry commission to examine the issue.
US Justice Department Indictment: According to the US Justice Department, Indian national Nikhil Gupta, currently in custody, faces charges related to the murder-for-hire of Pannun. The indictment implicates an unidentified Indian government employee in recruiting Gupta for the assassination plot, which was thwarted by US authorities.
Concerns and Clarifications: In response to queries about extradition requests for Pannun, Garcetti reiterated that American citizens can only be convicted or deported according to US laws. Jaishankar emphasized that India’s actions are driven by its national security interests, urging a comprehensive investigation into the allegations.
Broader Implications: The allegations and subsequent responses underscore the complexities of international relations and the importance of transparency and cooperation in addressing security threats. The incident highlights the need for stringent protocols and adherence to legal frameworks to prevent cross-border conflicts and maintain diplomatic integrity.
Continued Dialogue: Both India and the US have expressed willingness to continue cooperative efforts in investigating the matter while emphasizing the importance of mutual respect and adherence to international norms. The ongoing dialogue reflects a commitment to addressing security challenges while safeguarding diplomatic relations.
(With inputs from agencies)
