Political firestorm erupts over explosive remark; BJP and others demand accountability
Controversial Statement Sparks Backlash
Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut is facing intense criticism over his controversial remarks suggesting that the terrorists involved in the Pahalgam attack had not been apprehended because they might have “joined the BJP.” The statement, which went viral on Friday, has been labeled by many as not only politically inflammatory but also as deeply disrespectful to India’s armed forces.
Speaking to ANI, Raut said,
“Maybe the terrorists have joined the BJP, that’s why they are not being caught... Perhaps one day you’ll get a press note from BJP saying those six people have joined the party. So, forget everything.”
This comment has drawn widespread condemnation from political leaders across party lines, with several branding the remark as baseless and offensive.
BJP, Allies Hit Back: ‘Ridiculous and Shameful’
BJP leader Ram Kadam was among the first to respond, calling Raut’s statement “ridiculous” and “an insult to our armed forces who risk their lives for national security.”
Shiv Sena’s own former MP Sanjay Nirupam also distanced himself from Raut’s words, saying such remarks stem from “frustration and political desperation.”
Adding to the controversy, Congress MP Jairam Ramesh also drew flak for comparing elected Indian MPs with terrorists, stating, “Our MPs are roaming and terrorists are also roaming,” a comment that was quickly labeled “shameful” and “condemnable” by the BJP.
Raut’s Criticism of Operation Sindoor
This wasn’t the only inflammatory comment made by Raut. He also targeted the BJP-led Centre over Operation Sindoor, an Indian military operation that rescued hostages during a recent terror incident. Raut accused Prime Minister Modi of trying to politicize the armed forces’ achievements.
“This operation was done by our soldiers, but there's a competition to claim credit. The PM is leading this race. Sending BJP workers to present 'sindoor' to rescued women is an insult to the sacredness of sindoor,” Raut stated.
Raut further added that the opposition parties have united under Rahul Gandhi’s leadership to demand a special session in Parliament dedicated to discussing Operation Sindoor, its implications, and what he called the "excessive politicization" of military efforts.
Justification or Irresponsibility?
While Sanjay Raut may argue that his provocative remarks were meant to question the alleged failures in national security and political accountability, critics say he has crossed a line, especially by dragging the ruling party into direct association with terror suspects without evidence.
The justification offered—that these comments are rhetorical or symbolic—rings hollow for many, especially families of security personnel and citizens seeking political discourse based on facts and responsibility.
Even within the broader opposition, the remarks have raised discomfort. In a time of increasing political polarization, such sweeping allegations, critics argue, risk undermining democratic institutions and demoralizing those in uniform.
Words Matter in Turbulent Times
In a politically charged environment, rhetoric can either ignite unity or deepen divides. Sanjay Raut’s remarks, while perhaps rooted in frustration, have not only provoked a political storm but also prompted concerns about the tone and tenor of opposition discourse. As India continues to battle threats on multiple fronts, the need for responsible leadership and respectful dialogue becomes all the more urgent.
(With agency inputs)
